Terre des Lions/Pride Lands [Disney Adventure World - 202?]

dolsami a écrit:

Et ça pourrait parfaitement être le moment d'une voire de la chute, non ?

J’imagine bien qu’on monte pendant la chanson de Scar « be prepared » et puis on descend pendant la débandade et la chute de Mufasa. Après il peut avoir la deuxième montée avec la tête de Mufasa dans le ciel et finalement la grand chute pendant la bataille finale.

EduBTM a écrit:

dolsami a écrit:

Et ça pourrait parfaitement être le moment d'une voire de la chute, non ?

J’imagine bien qu’on monte pendant la chanson de Scar « be prepared » et puis on descend pendant l’estampie et la chute de Mufasa. Après il peut avoir la deuxième montée avec la tête de Mufasa dans le ciel et finalement la grand chute pendant la bataille finale.

C’est quoi l’estampie?

magnyseb a écrit:

EduBTM a écrit:

dolsami a écrit:

Et ça pourrait parfaitement être le moment d'une voire de la chute, non ?

J’imagine bien qu’on monte pendant la chanson de Scar « be prepared » et puis on descend pendant l’estampie et la chute de Mufasa. Après il peut avoir la deuxième montée avec la tête de Mufasa dans le ciel et finalement la grand chute pendant la bataille finale.

C’est quoi l’estampie?

J'aurais bien dis une danse médiévale mais bon

Par contre j'espère que le restaurant donnera une vue directement sur l'attraction façon "Pirates des Caraïbes" avec le Blue Lagon... Opus Captain Jack

magnyseb a écrit:

C’est quoi l’estampie?

Débandade ? Désolé, le français n'est pas ma première langue . Stampede en anglais ou estampida en espagnol

Satisfait du concept d’attraction sur Le Roi Lion. La végétation ça ne rend pas super sur la maquette mais j’ai confiance que ce soit réussi en vrai. Et tout le côté pente douce pour recouvrir le bâtiment et faire la transition avec le reste de la zone me plaît bien. Ça me fait un peu penser à la gare de Rennes

J'ai du mal à imaginer comment ça va rendre de passer du lac à cette zone. ça me semble complètement hors-sujet, pas cohérent du tout comme ensemble. La maquette me fait absolument par rêver, vu comme ça on dirait un truc très vide avec des plans d'herbes un peu tristes...

Content que l'attraction ne soit pas basée sur le live action par contre, j'espère qu'ils feront un truc bien car il y a une bonne base.

Si le Roi Lion est vrai, on peut commencer à refaire la liste des rumeurs avancées par les sources qui ont vu juste.

Grosso-modo :
Pandora a Adventure World
Coaster Star-Wars a discoveryland
Perso c'est la première proposition qui me hype le plus et que j'espère voir être réalisée avant

Oregon Trail a écrit:

Grosso-modo :
Pandora a Adventure World
Coaster Star-Wars a discoveryland
Perso c'est la première proposition qui me hype le plus et que j'espère voir être réalisée avant

Troisième parc
Si si, ça en fait bien partie !

Ne rêvons pas trop non plus

-10nez- a écrit:

Flounder69 a écrit:

Disneyland Paris News a écrit:

Découvrez la maquette de l'attraction et de la zone thématique dédiées au Roi Lion de #DisneylandParis, en direct du pavillon Imagineering: Behind the Dreams ! #D23

Même la chute finale à l'air de faire pitiée a vu de nez si on prende en compte la maquette elle doit faire 8/10 mètres grand maximum.

Faut arrêter d'écrire des conneries à la fin. La chute finale fera une vingtaine de mètres et le sommet de la montagne avec Pride Rock sera d'une trentaine de mètres !!!
L'ensemble de la montagne (sans compter l'immense show-building derrière) est presque aussi grande à elle seule que le land Frozen.
On se rend compte de la taille de la montagne sur le concept art général du parc mais aussi sur la maquette générale de l'ensemble de Adventure world. Suffit de regarder la taille des maisons d'Arandelle comparé à la montagne du roi lion.
Le bashing, c'est bien un moment, mais avec de vrais arguments, pas des fake news. On est vraiment ici dans la caricature et la mauvaise foi crasse.

Bah sur la maquette la chute doit faire l'équivalent de 3x les bateaux et ça m'entonnerai qu'il fassent 5 mètres c'est pas de la fake news juste de l'observation.

Après 8/10 mètres j'ai peut etre un peu abuser mais ç m'etonnerais vraiment qu'elle fasse 15m +

Sur les maquettes, on peut voir des animaux autour du rocher. Peut-on imaginer des spectacles « circle of life » et/ou de vrais animaux (même si les zoos ne sont plus vraiment en odeur de sainteté en France) ?

Sur Splash Mountain Tiana’s Bayou Adventure au MK la chute fait 17,5 mètres et c’est déjà une belle chute qu’on sent bien passer. C’est un flume c’est pas un hyper coaster.

Je suis le premier à regretter d’avoir un flume a la place de RoR mais en tant que flume il fera le job en terme de sensations attendues dans ce type de ride (en espérant des éléments plus originaux à l’intérieur comme des turntables, chute en arrière, etc… sans quoi Frozen sera plus original à ce niveau et ce serait un comble)

De ce qu'on voit sur la grande maquette, la chute fait au moins 15 mètres, elle semble également avoir une bosse juste après (comme Chiapas).
Je m'inquiète pas non plus pour la présence d'autres chute durant le ride. Globalement je m'attend à minimum 3 chutes, dont une similaire au moment de rétrécir dans Tiana's Bayou Adventure (je sais plus le nom de ce type de chute, il y a en a une au parc astérix).

Moi ce qui me rassure c'est de voir des bateaux avec 4 rangés de 3, j'avais peur qu'ils proposent des bateaux comme au pirate de Shanghai, avec 5 rangés de 5 personnes (bonjour l'angoisse quand tu es au milieu)

Ce sont des rangées de 3 personnes sur la maquette.

Quant à la bosse, j’entends plusieurs personnes le dire mais personnellement je ne vois aucune bosse sur cette maquette. Ce serait bien en effet.

Quentin_D a écrit:

Sur les maquettes, on peut voir des animaux autour du rocher. Peut-on imaginer des spectacles « circle of life » et/ou de vrais animaux (même si les zoos ne sont plus vraiment en odeur de sainteté en France) ?

ça serais criminel de poser des des vrai animaux dans un si petits espace.

Bon, sinon, vu ce jour. Ca clôture ce débat déjà.

romy_czne a écrit:

Bon, sinon, vu ce jour. Ca clôture ce débat déjà.

Mais les travaux devraient commencer l'année prochaine, non? Et ils sont toujours au debut avec la planification? Après l’annonce et l’info que les travaux sont planifiés pour 2025 déjà j’ai cru que la phase de planification est terminé depuis longtemps déjà.

C'est curieux, ils sont sur ce projet (qui n'en est plus un ) depuis 2019 et là , ils disent qu'ils sont qu'au début du du projet alors qu'ils nous ont présenté une maquette de cette Zone . C'est assez contradictoire. On va devoir encore attendre combien d'années 5 , 6 ans ?

L'article de Forbes ne met pas pour autant de côté le film de 2019 dans le projet.
On peut noter :

- Il est vite devenu évident que Disney n'avait pas accidentellement publié le mauvais concept art ou utilisé la mauvaise formulation dans l'annonce, car il a procédé à plusieurs publications similaires dans différentes langues et a même publié une version animée de l'illustration montrant les personnages du film animé par ordinateur.

- « Bien que la phase de conception détaillée soit toujours en cours et que davantage de détails soient révélés ultérieurement, cette nouvelle zone immersive célébrera la magie de la franchise Le Roi Lion dans son ensemble. L'attraction principale suivra l'histoire et l'apparence du film d'animation original », a déclaré Disneyland Paris dans un communiqué. « L'attraction sera basée sur le film d'animation de 1994. Les illustrations conceptuelles publiées pour D23 sont uniquement indicatives car nous en sommes aux premières étapes du projet. »

- Bien que cela rétablisse la vérité, cela n'explique pas pourquoi le parc a publié à plusieurs reprises des images montrant les personnages animés par ordinateur et a même pris la peine de créer et de publier une version animée de l'œuvre. Une demande de commentaires supplémentaires a été envoyée et ce rapport sera mis à jour si une réponse est reçue.

- "Il peut sembler stupéfiant que Disney ait fait une autre gaffe quelques semaines plus tard, mais en réalité, tout n'est peut-être pas ce qu'il semble être. [...] L'utilisation par Disney de personnages animés par ordinateur et de leurs homologues dessinés dans ses communications sur le land du Roi Lion lui permet de garder ses options ouvertes quant à ce qui sera finalement utilisé. Le land n'a pas encore de date d'ouverture, donc le temps joue en faveur de Disney. Si Mufasa est un échec, l'entreprise peut s'en tenir à son projet de thème du pays du Roi Lion de 1994, mais si Mufasa est un succès retentissant, elle peut s'en tenir au concept art qui n'a clairement pas été créé et publié par accident.

Forbes a écrit:

Disney Sets The Record Straight About Upcoming Theme Park Attraction

Disney has issued a rare clarification to clear up confusion about an upcoming theme park attraction after fans claimed the media giant had misled them.

After months of decline in its stock price, Disney finally lifted the lid on some of its biggest upcoming projects at its biennial D23 bash at the weekend. However, one of its most eagerly-awaited announcements left more questions than answers.

For the past few years Disney's bottom line has been propped up by the profits from its Experiences division which includes its theme parks and cruise ships. Their success has compensated for the blockbuster losses burned up by the Disney+ streaming platform which only became profitable in the latest quarter, five years after it was launched. It came at just the right time as Disney recently forecast that over the next few quarters it is expecting a slowdown in demand for its domestic parks which generate the majority of the revenue and profit of its Experiences division.

As we reported, it was far from a spellbinding backdrop for a series of announcements about cost-intensive theme park investments which made it all the more important to ensure that they hit the mark.

Disney played it safe with many of the announcements as it revealed that it is working on attractions which have been rumoured for decades. They include a land dedicated to the Monsters, Inc. computer-animated movies at Disney's Hollywood Studios in Orlando whilst the neighboring Magic Kingdom will get an area themed to the villains from the Mouse's classic cartoons. Both projects date back to the days when Michael Eisner was in charge of Disney and have been discussed for so long that they had almost become legend.

Disneyland Paris also got in on the action and, like many of the other attractions, it wasn't a great surprise. British newspaper The Express set the scene for it back in November 2017 when it revealed that Disney would invest $2.1 billion in its Parisian theme park complex over the following decade. The news was finally officially confirmed by Disney in February 2018 at a meeting between its chief executive Bob Iger and French president Emmanuel Macron.

There are two key areas of investment. One is an overhaul of the resort's Disney Village shopping and dining district which the news was broken about on Forbes in 2018, precisely four years before it was officially announced by Disney.

The other component is the addition of three lands to the Walt Disney Studios, one of the two theme parks at Disneyland Paris. When the investment was officially announced, Disney revealed that the new lands would be themed to its Avengers superhero series, its computer-animated Frozen films and the Star Wars sci-fi saga.

In July 2022 Avengers Campus swung open its doors and at D23 Disney announced that the Frozen land will follow suit in 2026, by which time the Studios will have been renamed Disney Adventure World. The force was not so strong with the Star Wars land which was quietly dropped over the past few years.

In an interview on French television in 2022, Disneyland Paris' president Natacha Rafalski was asked directly if the Star Wars land was still planned and she replied that "we are still working on the third theme. We will make announcements about this when we are ready." As the Star Wars land wasn't publicly dropped, it kept the public guessing and the anticipation increased right up to D23.

Rumours swirled that it would be replaced with a land themed to The Lion King, one of Disney's most beloved franchises, and that's precisely what was announced at the event. However, this was just the start of the story.

The announcement of the Lion King land was accompanied by concept art, an online video and several scale models. They all showed a land with lush green rolling hills leading up to a rocky outcrop where the eponymous feline is famously brandished before flocks of animals in the 1994 hand-drawn animated original and its remake 25 years later. The 2019 movie shares the same story but overlays computer-animated characters onto live action backgrounds.

In the Lion King land at Disneyland Paris, water pours down a steep slope under the rocky plinth as a log flume is integrated into the area. So far, so Disney but then comes the twist which cuts to the heart of one of the many challenges currently facing the company.

Confusingly, the concept art of the Lion King ride clearly shows the landscape and characters from the computer-animated remake even though Disney's announcement referred to it telling the story "seen in the beloved Walt Disney Animation Studios classic." It soon became clear that Disney hadn't accidentally posted the wrong concept art or used the wrong wording in the announcement as it proceeded to make multiple similar posts in different languages and even released a moving version of the artwork showing the characters from the computer-animated movie.

At D23 Josh D’Amaro, chairman of Disney Experiences, seemed to follow the script, rather than the images on the screen behind him, when he described the Lion King land as being "based on this animated classic". However, of course, the computer-animated remake is also based on the animated movie so it didn't appear to rule it out. Likewise, a social media post from Disney referred to the new development as an "attraction and immersive themed area inspired by The Lion King" which could also apply to both of the movies.

The models of the attraction don't help to clear up the confusion. Crucially, they contradict the concept art by including figurines which are clearly based on the 1994 movie. That's not all as the models also come with mini logs which have a side-by-side seat configuration whereas the art shows that they will have one seat behind the other. One of the models even has different landscaping around the attraction so they don't even tally with each other.

It is worth noting that, in contrast to other theme park operators, Disney has a history of releasing concept art which varies greatly from the end result. As we have reported, the artwork for the new log flume in the Magic Kingdom showed that it would be topped off with a soaring weeping willow tree but this was scrapped.

Likewise, the drawings of Disney's theme park take on the the Avatar movie had mountains which appeared to float but the anchor points of their real-life counterparts are hardly hidden.

In contrast, when the Middle Eastern theme park operator Miral was working on its Warner Bros. World park it released concept art which looks staggeringly similar to the end result as shown by the images here and here.

Disney's concept art tends to give more of an indication of the atmosphere of the attraction rather than being a precise template to follow. However, if the Lion King log flume isn't actually based on the computer-animated movie it wouldn't just have a different atmosphere but entirely different content so this isn't an explanation for the contradiction between the art, the announcement and the models.

The latter clearly aren't definitive evidence of what the end result will be like as the scale versions of the buildings found in other parts of the park don't even have signs on them. Adding further confusion to the matter, an eagle-eyed fan spotted that photos of the Lion King land model being made show that the reference images on the walls in the background are of scenes from the computer-animated movie, not the 1994 film even though the figurines are of the characters from it.

The icing on the cake is that the official online video about the new land features both the characters from the 1994 movie and the concept art showing their computer-animated counterparts. There has been no suggestion that both will be showcased in the attraction and it would look muddled if they were as they have completely contrasting styles. Indeed, that is why this matter may actually give significant insight into the future of an entire segment of Disney's business.
we revealed
The original Lion King is one of the most beloved animated movies of all time with a 93% audience score on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. However, the computer-animated remake doesn't rank far behind with 88% so you might think it wouldn't matter which movie the log flume is based on. Not so fast.

Since the computer-animated version was released in 2019, Disney has had little luck with the remakes of its classic cartoons. The last three alone are testimony to this.

Pinocchio and Peter Pan & Wendy were awarded audience scores of just 27% and 11% respectively whilst The Little Mermaid fared much better at 94%. It was the only one of the three movies which was released in theaters as the other two were streamed. Despite its high audience score, Little Mermaid failed to make a splash at the box office.

According to industry analyst Box Office Mojo, the movie grossed $569.6 million with around half of that going to Disney and theaters retaining the remainder. As we revealed, this only gave the movie a profit of around $40 million at the box office and it could still sink into the red. That's because the data was based on its $304.4 million (£243.5 million) costs to the end of August 2022 which was eight months before the movie was released. As it was effects-heavy, its budget will have swelled before then in post-production possibly pushing the picture into a loss.

Worse still, one of the chief criticisms of the movie was the calibre of the visuals and that is common to many of Disney's remakes. In The Little Mermaid, it was the fish. "Their tiny mouths are contorted in unnatural ways," said Vox. "It's as though there’s almost something sinister hiding underneath the computerized animal skin – and that's even before they start singing and dancing."

Likewise, critics complained that the computer-animated puppet in Pinocchio looked "creepy" and that the canine protagonists of Lady and the Tramp had "glassy, expressionless eyes." Although the Lion King remake made an impressive $1.7 billion at the box office, viewers aren't as attached to its characters as they are to the hand-drawn originals. That is clear from the almighty backlash to the concept art of the Lion King land.

"Oh god please not inspired by the live action movie," said Clay Freeman on social media. "YUCK! It's the Live-Action one," added another user with others going even further. "The decision to base this off the live action has spoiled any excitement I had," read one comment with another adding that "no one wants live action."

For many, the computer-generated characters aren't authentic with one user asking Disney "why’d you use the awful remake version for this concept art instead of the real version?" This was echoed by social media user Blake Haupt who also asked Disney "why on earth would you use the live action version?"

The answer is synergy. If the movies in the theaters are good enough, they convince kids to subscribe to Disney+ so that they can stream the films at home. Watching them reminds the kids to ask their parents to take them to the theme parks so that they can go on the rides based on the movies. Gift shops selling merchandise featuring the characters in the rides are cunningly placed at the exits of the attractions so that riders have to pass through them when they are in a happy frame of mind. This encourages them to buy the merchandise and when they take it home it reminds their kids of the park which encourages them to book a return visit and the cycle begins anew.

This model only works if the Intellectual Property (IP) that the ride is based on reflects the movies that Disney is making. It drives revenue and therefore profit which is what Disney's Experiences division needs so it remains to be seen whether the media giant would take a risk by basing a new ride on very old IP. Apparently not, according to Iger.

Talking at the recent MoffettNathanson Media and Communications Summit, he revealed the impact that Disney's IP has on the return it makes from its theme parks. "Interestingly enough, if you look – if you analyze carefully how we achieve those returns on invested capital in the parks, it was all about the IP. So, for quite a long time, new attractions in lands at the parks were based on essentially either very old IP or no IP, just an attraction. And starting really with Cars Land and Toy Story and there are a few others, I can’t remember this, all the specifics, we decided that almost all of our investment in the parks in terms of attractions and lands would be using that IP. And it’s very, very clear what that delivers."

Twitter user TheMagicEverywhere also made the astute observation that it would be more logical to base the Lion King land on the life-like computer-animated version so that it doesn't look fake or cartoony. Disney seems to think otherwise.

"While the detailed designing phase is still under way and more details will be revealed at a later stage, this new immersive area will celebrate the magic of the Lion King franchise as a whole. The main attraction will follow the story and design of the original animated movie," said Disneyland Paris in a statement. "The attraction will be based on the 1994 animated movie. The concept art released for D23 is illustrative only as we are in early stages of the project."

Although this sets the record straight, it doesn't explain why the park repeatedly released images showing the computer animated characters and even went to the trouble of creating and releasing a moving version of the artwork. A request for further comment has been sent and this report will be updated if a response is received.

Regardless of the reason for the decision, this does not seem to be the clearest way to begin promoting the new land, especially as it has changed its theme once already. It isn't just confusing, it could unnecessarily put off potential customers if they wrongly believe the ride will feature the computer-animated characters.

"The concept art is misleading, the ride isn't going to be based on the remake," wrote Dom Brown on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. Another added "Josh said it was based on the original animated Lion King. Someone else said the model shows simba in the animated style. The concept art is misleading I think." Yet another user shared this view and said "it is not based of the live action Lion king. The concept art is misleading."

Trying to make sense of this, an X user called Aly wrote "I'm still so confused, it says 'themed to The Animated 'The Lion King'' But the concept art uses the live action. Are they just place holders for the art or what?"

If that is the reason it would be a tremendous blunder, especially as it comes just two months after Disney spoiled the surprise of its new log flume in the Magic Kingdom by releasing a disenchanting ride-through video a month before its official debut as we reported. It may seem staggering that Disney has made another gaffe just weeks later but actually all may not be what it seems.

In December Disney will release Mufasa, a prequel to the computer-animated Lion King as it tells the story of the feline's father who dies at the hands of his brother in the first movie. Mufasa features the same computer-animated characters as its predecessor and given how well it performed at the box office, Disney has high hopes for the new movie. It will be a litmus test for whether the malaise over the remakes can be overcome and if not it could spell the end of the format.

Disney's use of the computer-animated characters and their hand-drawn counterparts in its communications about the Lion King land enables it to keep its options open as to which will end up being used. The land does not have an opening date yet so time is on Disney's side. If Mufasa is a flop then it can stick with its plan to theme the land to the 1994 film but if Mufasa is a smash hit then it could stick to the concept art which was clearly not created and released by accident.

A fan called Boria wrote on X, "we all know they’re waiting to see if the upcoming Mufasa movie will be a hit to decide on that." If so, it suggests Disney is aware that its computer-animated remakes may be on their last legs due to public apathy. That may not be music to investors' ears as Disney has missed at least one obvious opportunity for a live-action sequel as we have reported.

In contrast, Disneyland Paris is not leaving any stone unturned. Lise Valencia, senior business solutions manager at Disneyland Paris Event Group, revealed today that the Lion King land was "the first in a series of exciting announcements about the ambitious transformation of our parks." She added that "more exciting news is coming this week."

That would be no bad thing as Disneyland Paris was short-changed by D23. The Lion King log flume was the only new ride announced for the French resort whereas the US parks got more than ten. Moreover, an outdoor log flume isn't perhaps ideal in a country where the temperature often falls below freezing in winter. As an X user called Phoebes also pointed out, "can we really call it a land when it’s one ride?"

These kind of criticisms were lost in the furore about the theme of the attraction and that could be just the happy ending that Disney was actually looking for.

Encore une fois, la communication est désastreuse.
"Detailed designing phase is still under way"
Ça concerne des tâches de conception qui peuvent encore être faite pendant la construction.
Le conception du gros œuvre, elle, est terminée. À quelques détails près.

Le meilleur indicateur pour confirmer cela, c'est un dépôt de permis de construire dans les jours/semaines qui viennent.

L'article de Forbes, c'est un peu de la branlette intellectuelle pour le coup.
Faut arrêter, ils vont pas attendre de voir si Mufasa est un succès pour décider quelle version du Roi Lion sera adaptée dans le ride. Ne serait-ce que pour UNE RAISON : qui va acheter des peluches de Timon, Pumba ou Simba de la version live action ? Qui a envie de serrer une peluche qui représente un vrai phacochère ?
La version live action a été un carton au box-office, mais elle n'a en rien éclipsé le dessin animé de 1994 qui reste la référence (et notamment sur tout le merchandising)
D'ailleurs, à ce jour, aucun des remakes en live (même ceux qui ont eu du succès, comme Aladdin, La Belle et la Bête, Le Roi lion) est devenu un classique qui a pris la place du dessin animé original.
Utiliser les personnages live dans le ride serait la plus grosse bêtise de l'histoire des parcs Disney et celle-là, je n'y crois pas.

Enfin, pondre un pavé comme l'a fait Forbes pour décortiquer le concept art mais ne même pas relever qu'il n'y a pas que la présence des personnages live action qui cloche dedans, mais aussi tout bêtement l'embarcation (qui n'est pas la même que sur la maquette et heureusement), ça suffit pour se dire qu'il n'y a aucune conclusion à tirer de cette image dont je ne sais pas comment elle a pu être approuvée...
(après, je veux bien croire que pour créer de façon plus réaliste les décors du land lui-même ils puisent dans le film de 2019, mais pas le ride)

gregzzz a écrit:

Quant à la bosse, j’entends plusieurs personnes le dire mais personnellement je ne vois aucune bosse sur cette maquette. Ce serait bien en effet.

c'est difficile à dire, surtout sans avoir vu la maquette en vrai, mais sur cette image, on peut spéculer qu'il y ait une bosse au bas de la descente (mais sans certitude). Après, je ne sais pas si c'est une bonne idée, ça pourrait rendre le ride plus violent alors qu'il doit quand même rester familial, comme un Big Thunder Mountain.



Au passage, pour ceux qui doutent de la hauteur de la chute (et du gigantisme de la montagne elle-même), sur cette photo, si les visiteurs devant la chute sont bien à échelle, on se rend compte à quel point c'est énorme

Je me suis refait le roi lion ce weekend (l'original bien sûr car aucune chance que le ride soit sur le live action)

Franchement quel meilleur choix pour créer un grand dark ride majestueux dune dizaine de minutes?

J'ai du mal a comprendre ceux qui pensent que c'est un mauvais choix franchement

Mr.Freddy a écrit:

(après, je veux bien croire que pour créer de façon plus réaliste les décors du land lui-même ils puisent dans le film de 2019, mais pas le ride)

Et heureusement même !
Il est très difficile de retranscrire en 3D un dessin animé en 2D, surtout concernant les décors.
Un rockwork inspiré du film de 1994 nous aurait donné un pâté orange pas trop réaliste.
Je pense que ce mix d'inspiration film d'animation et prise de vue réel est une très bonne idée !